4.5 Article

Strength asymmetry and osteoarthritis risk factors in unilateral trans-tibial, amputee gait

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 296-300

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.05.003

关键词

Gait; Amputee; Trans-tibial; Knee osteoarthritis; Symmetry; Muscle strength; Kinetics

资金

  1. American Society of Biomechanics
  2. Independence Prosthetics-Orthotics, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Persons with a unilateral, trans-tibial amputation have an increased risk of developing osteoarthritis (OA) in the knee of their intact limb. Between-side strength discrepancies observed in individuals with an amputation may indicate overuse of the intact limb and increased osteoarthritis risk; however, the relationship between lower extremity strength and gait mechanics has not been addressed in previous literature. It was hypothesized that amputee subjects' strength and gait would be more asymmetrical than controls, and that strength asymmetry would positively correlate with gait variable asymmetry and intact side gait variables associated with osteoarthritis risk. Eight persons with unilateral, trans-tibial amputation and eight able-bodied control subjects participated. Three gait variables related to osteoarthritis risk (knee external adduction moment, knee adduction moment load rate, and vertical ground reaction force load rate) were measured bilaterally, along with three strength measures (hip abductors, knee extensors, and knee flexors). Four of the six variables were more asymmetrical in the amputee group than the control group (p < 0.05 and/or effect size greater than 0.70). Knee extension strength asymmetry was significantly related to knee adduction moment load rate asymmetry (rho = 0.714), and knee flexion strength asymmetry was moderately related to the vertical ground reaction force on the intact limb (rho = 0.643). Results suggest that strength asymmetry in unilateral trans-tibial amputees has a moderate relationship with osteoarthritis risk, and may be a useful way to assess gait ability and the need for rehabilitation in this population. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据