4.5 Article

Number of strides required for reliable measurements of pace, rhythm and variability parameters of gait during normal and dual task walking in older individuals

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 23-28

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.017

关键词

Gait; Elderly; Dual task; Reliability

资金

  1. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation at Mayo Clinic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reliability with which spatiotemporal gait parameters are measured has neither been well-established for variability parameters nor during dual task walking. The purpose of this study was to examine test-retest reliability of three gait parameters representing pace, rhythm and variability in healthy older persons during normal and dual task walking and to determine the number of strides necessary to measure the parameters reliably. Twenty-four healthy adults aged 65 or older participated in the study. Subjects walked during normal and dual task (backward spelling) walking conditions at self-selected speeds and then repeated the tests. Velocity, cadence and variability in stride velocity were measured with GAITRite (R) instrumentation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated and the numbers of strides required to meet desired magnitudes of reliability were estimated with the Spearman-Brown prophecy formula. ICCs for velocity and cadence were high (>0.841) during normal and dual task walking, indicating strong test-retest reliability. Test-retest reliability for variability in stride velocity was moderate (ICC = 0.656) in normal walking and poor (ICC = 0.226) in dual task walking. While data collected from fewer than 10 to 20 strides may reliably measure velocity and cadence in either normal or dual task walking, measuring variability in stride velocity reliably may require that data be collected from hundreds of strides, particularly in dual task walking. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据