4.5 Article

Concurrent validity of a trunk tri-axial accelerometer system for gait analysis in older adults

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 444-448

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.11.003

关键词

Accelerometry; Validity; Gait; Aging

资金

  1. StiftungDiakoniewerk NeumunsterSchweizerische Pflegerinnenschule

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was (1) to determine the concurrent validity of a trunk tri-axial accelerometer system (DynaPort (R)(MiniMod)) with the GAITRite (R) system for spatio-temporal gait parameters at preferred, slow and fast self-selected walking speed that were recorded for averaged and individual step data in an older adult population and (2) to compare the levels of agreement for averaged step data from different walking distances and individual step data. The levels of agreement between the two systems for averaged step data was excellent for walking speed, cadence, step duration and step length (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between 0.99 and 1.00, ratios limits of agreement (RLOA) between 0.7% and 3.3%), moderate for variability of step duration (ICCs between 0.88 and 0.98 and RLOAs between 19% and 34%) and low for variability of step length (ICCs between 0.24 and 0.33 and RLOAs between 73% and 87%). The levels of agreement for individual step duration and step length were moderate with ICCs between 0.81 and 0.89 and with RLOAs between 9% and 13%. Comparing RLOAs from averaged step data across the different walking distances and individual step data, the RLOAs decreased with increased number of steps. The results of this study demonstrate that the DynaPort (R)(MiniMod) system, which allows measurements in real life conditions, is a highly valid tool for assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters for averaged step data across a walkway length of approximately 20 m in independent living elderly. Gait variability measures and individual step data need to be viewed with caution because of the moderate to low levels of agreement between the two systems. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据