4.5 Article

Long distance running increases plantar pressures beneath the metatarsal heads - A barefoot walking investigation of 200 marathon runners

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 152-155

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.012

关键词

running; marathon; pedobarography; foot loading; metatarsal stress fractures; biomechanics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The growing popularity of endurance sports activities is associated with a growing number of metatarsal stress fractures in recreational runners. Excessive foot loading has been suggested as a potential cause for these problems [Bennell, K, Matheson G, Meeuwisse W. Brukner P. Risk factors for stress fractures. Sports Med 1999;28(2):91-122]. Therefore, the question arises whether long distance running affects foot loading characteristics like ground reaction forces and peak pressure in specific areas of the foot. Purpose: To investigate the effects of long distance running on plantar pressure patterns before and after a marathon race. Study design: Repeated measurements of recreational runners before and after a marathon race. Methods: Two hundred participants of the third Muenster marathon, 2004, were measured before and after the race with plantar pressure measurements during barefoot walking on a capacitive platform. The ratio between forefoot and toe loading was calculated to assess a suggested loading shift between these areas. Results: The results of the whole group of participants revealed a significant difference in foot loading characteristics before and after the race. Post-race peak pressure and impulse values were higher in the forefoot regions and reduced under the toes. Conclusions: The increased peak pressure under the metatarsal heads after the race indicates a load shift from the toes to the metatarsal heads. This suggests an increased loading of the metatarsal bones and could explain the increased incidence of metatarsal stress fractures in long distance runners. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据