4.3 Article

Near-Natural Silviculture: Sustainable Approach for Urban Renaturalization? Assessment Based on 10 Years Recovering Dynamics and Eco-Benefits in Shanghai

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000276

关键词

Renaturalization; Near-natural; Native species; Urban forestry; Urban greening; Sustainability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40971041]
  2. 211 Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the near-natural silviculture approach as a method for urban renaturalization has been widely applied in the world, there have been few reports about its long-term recovering dynamics, especially its eco-benefits. This is necessary to verify that its sustainability can meet new, multiple demands between the dual driving forces of rapid urbanization and ecological construction. This study examined the 10-year dynamics of the near-natural forest in Pudong New Area of Shanghai, China, and assessed its eco-benefits through comparison with natural forests and other artificial forests. The results indicated that the site revegetated by the near-natural silvicultural approach formed a stable forest with a more complex structure and beautiful landscape after 10 years of recovery, which had similar eco-benefits to natural forests and greater economic savings than other artificial forests. However, the near-natural forest only coincides with its overseas counterparts in theory; its substance and implementation are highly diverse across cities and pressures. Therefore, this study examined the recovering dynamics of two other near-natural forests in Shanghai to further optimize the traditional near-natural silvicultural approach. In short, the application of a reasonable, scientific renaturalization concept using a near-natural method to construct an urban green living landmark with a zonal vegetation community will positively affect the conservation of local biodiversity and the construction of a local characteristic environmental landscape. (C) 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据