4.4 Review

Circulating tumor cells in uveal melanoma

期刊

FUTURE ONCOLOGY
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 101-109

出版社

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/FON.10.143

关键词

biopsy; cutaneous melanoma; diagnosis; melanoma; metastasis; prognosis; uveal melanoma

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite advances in the diagnosis and local tumor control, the overall mortality rate for uveal melanoma remains high because of the development of metastatic disease. The clinical and histopathological systems currently being used to classify patients are not sufficiently accurate to predict metastasis. Tumor genotyping has demonstrated significant promise but obtaining tumor tissue can be problematic. Furthermore, assessment of tumor tissue does not indicate whether tumor cells have actually been shed and cannot indicate whether treatment is reducing metastasis. The detection of circulating tumor cells in blood has been shown to be a prognostic biomarker that can be used to monitor the effectiveness of therapy in patients with metastatic carcinoma. Uveal melanoma disseminates hematogenously, and the detection of circulating melanoma cells may potentially be useful for diagnosis, risk stratification, and the monitoring of disease progression and treatment efficacy. PCR-based and immunomagnetic cell isolation techniques, derived from studies in patients with cutaneous melanoma, have been tested. For various biological and technical reasons, they have not demonstrated the accuracy and reproducibility required for an effective prognostic assay in patients with uveal melanoma. Assessments have been confounded by false positives and negatives and thus, correlations between circulating melanoma cells and survival have not yet been established. Circulating melanoma cell detection is a valuable tool for investigating metastasis in uveal melanoma and also has the potential to become a standard part of uveal melanoma management. However, more research on the biology of uveal melanoma as well as improvements upon the current technologies are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据