4.0 Article

Climate-induced abortion and predation: reproductive success of the pioneer shrub Dillenia suffruticosa in Malaysian Borneo

期刊

JOURNAL OF TROPICAL ECOLOGY
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 50-62

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0266467415000632

关键词

continuous flowering; excess production; pioneer plant; reproductive assurance; resource boom

类别

资金

  1. Research Institute for Humanity and Nature project [D-04]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [20-687002, 22-6034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In South-East Asian tropical plants, the excess production of reproductive organs is believed to be controlled by resource booms. However, the continuously flowering shrub Dillenia suffruticosa (Dilleniaceae) is often infested by fruit predators and occasionally produces fruits where mature seeds are absent. These reproductive features may support an alternative hypothesis for excess production of reproductive organs: the reproductive assurance hypothesis. We marked 1190 reproductive organs in 180 inflorescences of 41 plant individuals and examined the relationships among the reproductive organ features and the effects of both climate and predators. During the flower budding stage, the fate of reproductive organs was primary climate-induced. The percentage of flower/fruit abscission increased as the cumulative temperature and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) decreased and the cumulative precipitation increased, supporting the resource boom hypothesis. Insect predation was the most common fate of immature fruits. As PAR increased, the prevalence of insect predation and production of mature seed increased. At a reduced PAR, the production of fruits with many immature seeds could serve as compensatory reproductive organs for insect predators, consistent with the reproductive assurance hypothesis. The excess production of reproductive organs might be a result of adaptation to climate fluctuations in the South-East Asian tropics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据