4.4 Article

A clone-based transcriptomics approach for the identification of genes relevant for itaconic acid production in Aspergillus

期刊

FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 602-611

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.01.013

关键词

cis-Aconitate decarboxylase; Itaconic acid; Aspergillus terreus; Aspergillus niger; Lovastatin; Clone-based transcriptomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several Aspergillus species are well-known for the production of a variety of organic acids. In this study, a cloned based transcriptomics approach was used to identify genes crucial in the biosynthesis pathway for one of these acids, itaconic acid. From a number of different Aspergillus terreus controlled batch fermentations, those cultures with the largest difference in itaconic acid titer and productivity were selected for mRNA isolation. cDNAs derived from these mRNA samples were used for subsequent hybridization of glass slide arrays based on a collection of 5000 cDNA clones. A selection of 13 cDNA clones resulting in the strongest (>10-fold) differential hybridization signals were identified and subsequently the inserts of these clones were sequenced. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of in total five different gene inserts among the sequenced clones. From one of these sequences, encoding a gene of the MmgE-PrpD family, the full length coding region was shown to encode one of the crucial itaconic acid pathway enzymes cis-aconitate decarboxylase, by heterologous expression in Escherichia coli. Expression of this gene in Aspergillus niger, which is a natural citric acid producer, resulted in itaconate production. Genome analysis suggests that in A. terreus the cis-aconitate decarboxylase gene is part of an itaconate acid related gene cluster including genes encoding two pathway specific transporters and a Zinc finger protein. Interestingly, this cluster is directly linked to the large lovastatin gene cluster. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据