4.4 Article

Construction of an hdfA Penicillium chrysogenum strain impaired in non-homologous end-joining and analysis of its potential for functional analysis studies

期刊

FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 418-426

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.02.008

关键词

Penicillium chrysogenum; Homologous recombination; Targeting efficiency; Ku70 homolog; hdfA; Functional analysis; Beta-lactams

资金

  1. SenterNovem [IS 043055]
  2. Netherlands Genomics Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The homologous recombination mechanism for DNA-repair is not predominant in most filamentous fungi, resulting in extremely low targeting efficiencies for molecular engineering. To increase the gene targeting efficiency, it is becoming common practice to inactivate the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway that causes random integration, by deleting the fungal homologs of the human KU70 and KU80 genes that encode proteins functioning in the NHEJ pathway. This has been described for several filamentous fungi, but limited knowledge on the physiological consequences is available. In this study we characterized targeting efficiency and physiology of penicillinG producing Penicillium chrysogenum strains, in which the KU70 or KU80 homologues hdfA and hdfB had been deleted. Targeting efficiency was increased from ca. 1% in the reference strain to 47% and 56% in the hdfA and hdfB mutant strains, respectively, using an ends-out construct. Physiological and transcriptome analysis of glucose-limited chemostat cultures of the hdfA deletion strain and the reference strain showed minimal differences. Although, in a direct competition experiment to assess strain fitness, the reference strain had a clear advantage over the deletion strain, the results demonstrate the potential of Delta hdfA P. chrysogenum strains for the functional analysis of the recently completed A chrysogenum genome sequence and in further metabolic engineering of antibiotics production. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据