4.4 Article

Functional analysis of Candida albicans GPI-anchored proteins: Roles in cell wall integrity and caspofungin sensitivity

期刊

FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY
卷 45, 期 10, 页码 1404-1414

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.08.003

关键词

Candida albicans; GPI; Calcofluor; Cell wall; Surface

资金

  1. European Commission [MRTN-CT-2003-504148]
  2. French Ministry of Research
  3. Medical Research Council New Investigator Award
  4. BBSRC
  5. Welcome Trust
  6. MRC [G0400284] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C510191/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [G0400284] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The outer layer of the Candida albicans cell wall is enriched in highly glycosylated proteins. The major class, the GlycosylPhosphatidylInositol (GPI)-anchored proteins are tethered to the wall by GPI-anchor remnants and include adhesins, glycosyltransferases, yapsins and superoxide dismutases. In silico analysis suggested that C. albicans possesses 115 putative GPI anchored proteins (GpiPs), almost twice the number reported for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A global approach to characterise in silico predicted GpiPs has been initiated by generating a library of 45 mutants. This library was subjected to a screen for cell wall modifications by testing the cell wall integrity (SDS and Calcofluor White sensitivity) and response to caspofungin. We showed that, when caspofungin sensitivity was modified, in more than half of the cases the susceptibility can be correlated to the level of chitin and cell wall thickness: sensitive strains have low level of chitin and a thin cell wall. We also identified, for the first time, genes that when deleted lead to decreased caspofungin sensitivity: DFG5, PHR1, PGA4 and PGA62. The role of two unknown GpiPs, Pga3l and Pga62 in the cell wall structure and composition was clearly demonstrated during this study. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据