4.4 Article

From leaf to continent: The multi-scale distribution of an invasive cryptic pathogen complex on oak

期刊

FUNGAL ECOLOGY
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 39-50

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2018.08.001

关键词

Cryptic invasion; Cryptic species; Erysiphe; Oak; Plant pathogen; Powdery mildew; Quercus; Spatial distribution; Emission inventory; Species coexistence

资金

  1. Conseil Regional d'Aquitaine [20030304002FA, 20040305003FA]
  2. European Union FEDER [2003227]
  3. Investissements d'Avenir [ANR-10-EQPX-16-01]
  4. European BiodivERsA project RESIPATH: Responses of European Forests and Society to Invasive Pathogens
  5. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation [BIODIVERSA/0002/2012, ANR-13-EBID-0005-01]
  6. ANR (France) [ANR-13-BSV7-0011]
  7. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16K07613, 16F16097]
  8. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-15 0210]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spatial distribution and niche differentiation of three closely related species (Erysiphe alphitoides, Erysiphe quercicola and Erysiphe hypophylla) causing oak powdery mildew was studied at scales ranging from the European continent, where they are invasive, to a single leaf. While E. alphitoides was dominant at all scales, E. quercicola and E. hypophylla had restricted geographic, stand and leaf distributions. The large-scale distributions were likely explained by climatic factors and species environmental tolerances, with E. quercicola being more frequent in warmer climates and E. hypophylla in colder climates. The extensive sampling and molecular analyses revealed the cryptic invasion of E. quercicola in nine countries from which it had not previously been recorded. The presence of the three species was also strongly affected by host factors, such as oak species and developmental stage. Segregation patterns between Erysiphe species were observed at the leaf scale, between and within leaf surfaces, suggesting competitive effects. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd and British Mycological Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据