4.6 Article

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides is not a common pathogen on tropical fruits

期刊

FUNGAL DIVERSITY
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 33-43

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13225-010-0046-0

关键词

Anthracnose; Diagnosis; Fruit disease; Phylogeny

类别

资金

  1. Mae Fah Luang University Chiang Rai, Thailand [51101010029, 52101010002]
  2. Chinese Academy of Forestry [CAFYBB2007002]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX2-YW-Z-1026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides has been reported as one of the most important pathogens worldwide that infect at least 1000 plant species. Fruit rots (anthracnose) are often attributed to C. gloeosporioides and, to a lesser extent, to C. acutatum. These previous findings were, however, based on morphological identification or, if gene sequence data were used, comparisons were often made with wrongly applied names. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides was recently epitypified so that living cultures and sequence data are, for first time available for comparison with fresh collections. Analysis of sequence data of 25 isolates from eight tropical fruits are compared with the C. gloeosporioides epitype. Contrary to previous understanding, none of the 25 Colletotrichum isolates from tropical fruits was C. gloeosporioides. The five gene regions used in this study resolved Colletotrichum asianum, C fructicola, C. horii, C. kahawae and C. gloeosporioides in the 'gloeosporioides' complex as distinct phylogenetic lineages with high statistical support. Some other likely novel species in the gloeosporioides complex and C. siamense, however, received only moderate or low support and further studies are needed to clarify their phylogenetic affinities and taxonomic placements. Cultural, conidial and appressorial characters can be used to differentiate taxa into species complexes, but cannot separate species within a complex. This discovery will have significant impacts on many aspects of plant pathology, pathogen diagnosis, quarantine decisions, plant breeding, and plant disease management and control and these are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据