4.0 Article

Do the presence of filamentous cyanobacteria and an elevated temperature favor small-bodied Daphnia in interspecific competitive interactions?

期刊

FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED LIMNOLOGY
卷 185, 期 3-4, 页码 307-314

出版社

E SCHWEIZERBARTSCHE VERLAGSBUCHHANDLUNG
DOI: 10.1127/fal/2014/0641

关键词

Competitive ability; Daphnia; cyanobacteria; zooplankton; body size; temperature

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N N305 134440]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to the Size-Efficiency Hypothesis, when the intensity of fish predation is low, large-bodied zooplankton species are competitively superior as they are more efficient filter feeders than small-bodied species and they have relatively reduced metabolic demands per unit mass. The presence of filamentous cyanobacteria can reduce the competitive superiority of large-bodied cladocerans, because they are less resistant than small-bodied ones to interference with food collection by filaments. The viscosity of water decreases with increasing temperature which may alter the filtering mechanisms of cladocerans, making the large-bodied species even more susceptible to interference by cyanobacterial filaments. The aims of this study were (1) to test if the presence of the filamentous non-toxic cyanobacterium Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii shifts competitive dominance from a large-bodied cladoceran species towards a small-bodied one and (2) to determine whether the competitive superiority of a small-bodied species in the presence of cyanobacterial filaments is temperature-dependent. A laboratory competition experiment was conducted with large-bodied Daphnia pulicaria and small-bodied D. longispina, in the presence or absence of cyanobacteria in two different thermal regimes -18 and 25 degrees C. Unexpectedly, D. pulicaria was dominant over D. longispina, irrespective of the food and thermal treatments applied. The large-bodied Daphnia species was competitively superior even in the presence of filamentous cyanobacteria and at an elevated temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据