4.5 Article

Drought-induced mortality selectively affects Scots pine trees that show limited intrinsic water-use efficiency responsiveness to raising atmospheric CO2

期刊

FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 244-256

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/FP13067

关键词

die-off; tree rings; water stress; Western Mediterranean; delta C-13

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CGL2007-60120, CSD2008-0040, CGL2010-16373]
  2. FPU PhD scholarship
  3. University of Lleida, Department of Crop and Forest Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Widespread drought-induced tree mortality has been documented around the world, and could increase in frequency and intensity under warmer and drier conditions. Ecophysiological differences between dying and surviving trees might underlie predispositions to mortality, but are poorly documented. Here we report a study of Scots pines (Pinus sylvestris L.) from two sites located in north-eastern Iberian Peninsula where drought-associated mortality episodes were registered during the last few decades. Time trends of discrimination against C-13 (Delta C-13) and intrinsic water-use efficiency (WUEi) in tree rings at an annual resolution and for a 34 year period were used to compare co-occurring now-dead and surviving pines. Results indicate that both surviving and now-dead pines significantly increased their WUEi over time, although this increase was significantly lower for now-dead individuals. These differential WUEi trends corresponded to different scenarios describing how plant gas exchange responds to increasing atmospheric CO2 (C-a): the estimated intercellular CO2 concentration was nearly constant in surviving pines but tended to increase proportionally to C-a in now-dead trees. Concurrently, the WUEi increase was not paralleled by a growth enhancement, regardless of tree state, suggesting that in water-limited areas like the Mediterranean, it cannot overcome the impact of an increasingly warmer and drier climate on tree growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据