4.7 Article

Direct and indirect phenotypic selection on developmental trajectories in Manduca sexta

期刊

FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 598-607

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.01972.x

关键词

body size; developmental trajectory; growth rates; life history; Manduca sexta; natural selection; parasitoids

类别

资金

  1. NSF [IOS0641179, IOS1120500]
  2. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1120500] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Adult size and development time are the outcomes of growth and differentiation throughout the life of an individual organism its developmental trajectory. Correlations among ages and sizes across different life stages may influence both direct and indirect components of selection on body size and age during development. 2. We used two field studies in experimental gardens in fall and summer to evaluate phenotypic selection on size and age across larval, pupal and adult stages in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, and how this may vary across seasons. 3. Rapid larval development was positively associated with survival to pupation and adulthood, in part because it allowed escape from larval parasitoids. Larval mortality owing to parasitoids was greater in the fall than in the summer. Egg production was positively correlated with adult mass, but not with development time. 4. Principal component analyses of size and age throughout development showed that adult size and development time were not negatively correlated, contrary to life-history expectations. As a result, selection favouring larger adult size (via female reproduction) and selection favouring rapid larval development (via juvenile survival) do not act in opposition in this system. 5. We discuss the physiological mechanisms that may underlie the independence of adult size and early larval development for holometabolous insects, and the implications for selection on body size and developmental trajectories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据