4.7 Article

Maternal and abiotic effects on egg mortality and hatchling size of turtles: temporal variation in selection over seven years

期刊

FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 857-866

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01714.x

关键词

egg incubation; egg size; egg survival; maternal effects; nest moisture; nest temperature; nesting phenology; phenotypic selection; vegetation cover

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-9629529, DEB-0089680, DEB-0640932]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>1. Maternal and environmental factors influence embryo development and offspring phenotypes in ways that are likely to impact fitness. Most studies that address this issue, however, fail to mimic the complexities of natural environmental parameters and only quantify selection during a single season. 2. In this study, we examined year-to-year variation in how maternal factors (egg mass, nesting phenology and nest-site choice) and external abiotic factors (temperature and precipitation) impact egg survival and hatchling morphology in the painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) over seven nesting seasons in the field. In addition, we quantify annual variation in the strength and form of selection operating on maternal factors. 3. Overall, our results demonstrated very low, if any, consistency in how maternal and environmental factors impact egg survival and hatchling size in the field. That is, different variables had different effects in different years. Accordingly, the strength and form of natural selection operating on egg size, nesting phenology and nest-site choice were inconsistent across years, suggesting low potential for substantive or directional evolutionary shifts in these maternal effects. 4. These results may partially explain why traits like egg size and nest-site choice exhibit variation (i.e. are not perfectly optimized), and highlight the importance of multiyear field studies in gaining a more complete picture of the factors driving variation in critical early life-history events and demographic parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据