4.5 Article

Mutagenesis of barley malting quality QTLs with Ds transposons

期刊

FUNCTIONAL & INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 131-141

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10142-011-0258-8

关键词

Ac/Ds; Transposon reactivation; Genomics; Transformation; Barley; Cereals

资金

  1. Brewing and Malting Barley Research Institute
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Collaborative Research and Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various functional genomic tools are being used to identify and characterize genes in plants. The Activator/Dissociation (Ac/Ds) transposon-based approach offers great potential, especially in barley, due to its limited success of genetic transformation and its large genome size. The bias of the Ac/Ds system towards genic regions and its tendency toward localized transpositions can greatly enhance the discovery and tagging of genes linked to Ds. Barley is a key ingredient in malting and brewing industry; therefore, gene discovery in relation to malting has an industrial perspective. Malting quality in barley is a complex and quantitatively inherited trait. Two major quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting malting quality traits have been located on chromosome 4H. In this study, Ds was reactivated from parent transposants (TNP) lines, TNP-29 and TNP-79, where Ds was mapped in the vicinity of important malting QTLs. Reactivation of Ds was carried out both by conventional breeding and in vitro approaches. A threefold increase in reactivation frequency through the in vitro approach enabled the development of a new genomic resource for the dissection of malting QTL and gene discovery in barley. Identification of unique flanking sequences, using high-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR and inverse PCR from these populations, has further emphasized the new location of Ds in the barley genome and provided new transposon mutants especially in beta-GAL1, beta-amylase-like gene and ABC transporter for functional genomic studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据