4.7 Article

Influences of heating rate during coal char preparation and AAEMs on volatile-char interaction with different sources of biomass volatile

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 10-18

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.10.010

关键词

Volatile-char interaction; Co-gasification; Coal char; Biomass volatiles; Thermobalance reactor

资金

  1. Royal Golden Jubilee PhD. Program, Thailand Research Fund [PhD/0150/2551]
  2. Fuel Research Center, Department of Chemical Technology, Chulalongkorn University and General Sekiyu R & D Encouragement Assistance Foundation, 30th Research Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Volatile-char interaction is important for the operation of co-gasification of coal and biomass. Biomass generally produces large amount of volatiles while char is mainly produced from coal. Hence, in this study, the interaction between coal char and volatiles from biomass samples (xylan, cellulose and rice straw) was examined using a rapid-heating thermobalance reactor. Three types of coal char, consisting of slow pyrolyzed-coal char (Ex-char), fast pyrolyzed-coal char (In-char), and acid washed-coal char (Ac-char), were employed to reveal influences of heating rate during char preparation and retention of alkali and alkaline earth metallic (AAEM) species on char surface. The steam gasification rates of all coal chars in both cases with and without volatile contacting were investigated from the gas evolution rate and remaining char analyses. The results indicate that the steam gasification rates of Ex-char and In-char were significantly diminished by the volatiles derived from all sources, especially rice straw. However, in the case of Ac-char, the reduction of steam gasification rate was less important Moreover, the Ex-char exhibited the catalyst for the decomposition of biomass volatiles, resulting in the increase in gas production rate. Porous structure and the AAEM over char play crucial roles on the volatile-char interaction. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据