4.7 Article

Oxidation of activated carbon by dry and wet methods Surface chemistry and textural modifications

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 91, 期 11, 页码 1768-1775

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.07.018

关键词

Activated carbon; Dry and wet oxidations; Surface chemistry modification; Textural changes

资金

  1. Junta de Extremadura (Spain) [PDT08-A012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of dry and wet oxidation treatments of activated carbon (AC) on the surface chemistry and porous structure are studied. Using cherry stones (CS), AC was first prepared by carbonization at 900 degrees C for 2 h in N-2 and activation at 850 degrees C for 2 h in CO2. Then, the resulting AC was oxidized in O-2(air) or O-3 atmosphere and with HNO3 and H2O2 solutions. The acidic-basic surface sites were analyzed by FT-IR spectroscopy, Boehm method, and pH of the point of zero charge (pH(pzc)) and the porous structure by N-2 adsorption and mercury porosimetry. It has been found that the oxidizing agent, under specific reaction conditions, rather than whether it was a gas or a solute in aqueous solution, is the main factor that controls the changes produced in the surface chemistry and porous structure of AC. O-3 and HNO3 are the most effective oxidants to form acidic oxygen surface groups. However, the content of basic groups decreases for the four oxidants, the effect being much stronger for HNO3. A microporosity reduction is also observed, which is more important for O-2(air) and especially for HNO3 than for O-3 and H2O2. The percentage of microporosity loss is as high as 43.3 for HNO3. Mesoporosity significantly develops, whereas macroporosity usually remains practically unchanged. Dry oxidation of AC at 100 degrees C in O-3 has proved to be the most promising method to increase the content of acidic oxygen surface groups in the material without greatly decreasing the content of basic sites and microporosity and with a significant mesoporosity development. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据