4.7 Article

Synergetic effects of Y-zeolite and amorphous silica-alumina as main FCC catalyst components on triisopropylbenzene cracking and coke formation

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 171-179

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.08.013

关键词

FCC; Catalyst; Resid; Cracking; Y-zeolite

资金

  1. National Iranian Oil Refining
  2. Products Distribution Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synergetic effects of HY-zeolite and silica-alumina (SA), as two major components of an FCC catalyst, on the cracking activity and coking tendency during catalytic cracking of 1,3,5-triisopropylbenzene (TiPB, as a resid representative) were studied. NaY-zeolite and SA were synthesized by hydrothermal and co-precipitation methods, respectively, and ammonium exchanged for three times at 80 degrees C. The catalysts were characterized by XRD, XRF, SEM, BET, AAS and ammonia TPD techniques. TiPB cracking was investigated on four different catalyst configurations including SA, Y-zeolite, SAN and SA-Y in a fixed bed reactor. SAN stands for physical mixture of equal amounts of Y-zeolite and SA. For SA-Y, a bed of SA was placed upstream of the same amount of Y-zeolite. The catalysts were in-situ activated at 475 degrees C and evaluated by TiPB cracking at 350 degrees C. The coke content of the catalyst beds, after 40 min cracking of TiPB, was estimated by TPO using an FT-IR gas cell. At 3 min time on stream, 5.2 times higher yield of benzene, as a deep cracking product, is observed on SA-Y as compared to SA.Y. The TiPB conversion decreases in the order of SA-Y>SA. Y>Y-zeolite >> SA. Furthermore, as compared to Y-zeolite, 24% lower coke is formed on SA-Y. Also CO evolution during TPO of coked SA-Y catalyst is about 24% lower than that of the coked zeolite. As a result, protecting of Y-zeolite by SA from direct exposure to resid feed enhances the cracking activity, decreases the tendency to coke formation and diminishes CO emission in the catalyst regeneration process. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据