4.4 Article

Mediatorless Carbohydrate/Oxygen Biofuel Cells with Improved Cellobiose Dehydrogenase Based Bioanode

期刊

FUEL CELLS
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 792-800

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/fuce.201400003

关键词

Cellobiose Dehydrogenase; Bilirubin Oxidase; Direct Electron Transfer; Enzymatic Fuel Cell; Gold Nanoparticle; N-(6-mercapto)hexylpyridinium

资金

  1. European Commission (FP7 project) [NMP4-SL-2009-229255]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [13-04-12083]
  3. Swedish Research Council [2011-4958, 2013-6006]
  4. Swedish Institute (Visby programme)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct electron transfer (DET) between cellobiose dehydrogenase from Humicola insolens ascomycete (HiCDH) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) was achieved by modifying AuNPs with a novel, positively charged thiol N-(6-mercapto)hexylpyridinium (MHP). The DET enabled the use of the HiCDH enzyme as an anodic biocatalyst in the design of a mediatorless carbohydrate/oxygen enzymatic fuel cell (EFC). A biocathode of the EFC was based on bilirubin oxidase from Myrothecium verrucaria (MvBOx) directly immobilised on the surface of AuNPs. The following parameters of the EFC based on Au/AuNP/MHP/HiCDH bioanode and Au/AuNP/MvBOx biocathode were obtained in quiescent air saturated PBS, pH 7.4, containing: (i) 5 mM glucose-open-circuit voltage (OCV) of 0.65 +/- 0.011 V and the maximal power density of 4.77 +/- 1.34 mu W cm(-2) at operating voltage of 0.50 V; or (ii) 10 mM lactose-OCV of 0.67 +/- 0.006 V and the maximal power density of 8.64 +/- 1.91 mu W cm(-2) at operating voltage of 0.50 V. The half-life operation times of the EFC were estimated to be at least 13 and 44 h in air saturated PBS containing 5 mM glucose and 10 mM lactose, respectively. Among advantages of HiCDH/MvBOx FCs are (i) simplified construction, (ii) relatively high power output with glucose as biofuel, and (iii) the absence of the inhibition of the HiCDH based bioanode by lactose, when compared with the best previously reported CDH based bioanode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据