4.7 Article

An experimental investigation into the characteristics and deposition mechanism of high-viscosity coal ash

期刊

FUEL
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 14-20

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.11.031

关键词

Ash chemistry; Deposition; High-viscosity coal ash; Operating conditions; Particle size

资金

  1. Australian Research Council under the ARC Linkage Projects Scheme [LP100200135]
  2. Special Funds for Major State Basic Research Projects [2013CB228503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coal-fired boilers often develop massive fouling and slagging deposits on heat transfer surfaces in areas where coal ash particles have relatively high viscosities (>= 10(6) Pa s). In order to investigate the characteristics and mechanism of the problems, experiments were performed in a drop tube furnace and by use of a slagging probe in this study. The results showed that fouling deposits developed on the probe in the first stage, and then transformed into partially or fully fused slagging deposits. The deposition of high-viscosity coal ash was closely related to both the experimental conditions and the chemical composition of the ash. A low temperature on the probe surface and a high impact velocity of ash particles significantly inhibited ash deposition for the high-viscosity ash. The relative deposition ratio of high-viscosity ash, defined as the ratio of the mass of the deposit on the probe to the total mass of ash fed into the DTF, increased along with time initially and then diminished after reaching the maximum. Fine ash particles had higher deposition tendency compared to coarse particles, probably due to local eddies between the fingers on the front of the probe. The chemical compositions of coal ashes had an observable effect on the deposition behavior of high-viscosity ash. The findings of this work are significant for understanding the mechanism of high-viscosity ash deposition and determining the effect of key operating conditions relevant to deposition of high-viscosity ash. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据