4.7 Article

Coke graphitization and degradation across the tuyere regions in a blast furnace

期刊

FUEL
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 77-85

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.074

关键词

Coke; Graphitization; XRD; Tuyere drilling; Blast furnace

资金

  1. Australian Coal Association Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changes in particle size distribution and in the degree of graphitization of coke samples from various locations across the tuyere entrance of a blast furnace were examined. X-ray diffraction and a fixed bed reactor were used to measure carbon structure and reaction rate of the coke. The feed coke size was observed to decrease by more than 50% in the descent to the tuyere in the majority of the tuyere-level locations. About 60 wt.% of the core matter from the bosh and raceway locations consisted of less than half-size feed coke particles. The percentage of -3 mm and -0.45 mm size fractions observed in the recovered drill core material were less than 10 wt.% and 3 wt.% respectively particularly around the raceway locations. The graphitization degree of half-size coke particles is shown to be a suitable indicator of the temperature profile of tuyere-level regions of a blast furnace. The degree of graphitization of tuyere-level coke samples showed an inverse relationship with amount of potassium adsorbed as well as with the apparent reaction rate. The carbon structure as well as anisotropic texture of coke fines indicated higher ordering of carbon compared to the half-size cokes from the similar locations. The -0.45 mm size fraction of fines displayed a large proportion of graphite crystals. The study has confirmed the contribution of surface graphitization of cokes on the fines generation particularly in the raceway and birds nest regions. The study has implications for using the bench-scale assessment of coke performance and modeling of coke behavior to provide an understanding as to what is likely to occur in an industrial blast furnace. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据