4.7 Article

Microbial consortia for saccharification of woody biomass and ethanol fermentation

期刊

FUEL
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 815-822

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.01.037

关键词

Cellulase; Ethanol; Fungi; Microbial consortia; Saccharification

资金

  1. Converging Research Center Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011-50210]
  3. NRF grant
  4. Korea government [2012M3C5A1053339]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012M3C5A1053339] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Newly isolated Sistotrema brinkmannii and Agaricus arvensis were co-cultured using rice straw (20 g/L) as a carbon source and yeast extract (10 g/L) as a nitrogen source to produce high levels of cellobiohydrolase (12.6 U/mL), beta-glucosidase (21 U/mL), and endoglucanase (16.4 U/mL). The filter paper activity (FPU) of the mixed fungal culture was enhanced (1.61 FPU/mL) compared to that of S. brinkmannii (0.3 FPU/mL) or A. arvensis (0.5 FPU/mL) monoculture. Enzyme loading, substrate concentration, pH, and temperature were optimized by response surface methodology (RSM) to improve the saccharification yield of alkali-pretreated plant biomasses. The highest enzymatic hydrolysis (76.7%) was obtained from Pinus densiflora under the following conditions: crude enzyme loading 22.5 FPU/g-substrate, substrate 3.75%, temperature 35 degrees C, and pH 5. The enzymatic hydrolyzate of pretreated P. densiflora was used for ethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia stipitis, and a co-culture of both the strains. The co-culture of S. cerevisiae and P. stipitis produced 23% more ethanol than that produced by S. cerevisiae alone and 38% more ethanol than that produced by P. stipitis alone. This study shows the potential of exploiting a microbial consortium for the cost-effective production of cellulases for bioethanol processes. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据