4.5 Article

Pilot study of a novel vacuum-assisted method for decellularization of tracheae for clinical tissue engineering applications

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/term.1979

关键词

decellularization; trachea; vacuum; transplantation; tissue engineering

资金

  1. NPIMR
  2. MRC [VOX I]
  3. MRC [MR/K026453/1, G1001539] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G1001539, MR/K026453/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0513-10089] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue engineered tracheae have been successfully implanted to treat a small number of patients on compassionate grounds. The treatment has not become mainstream due to the time taken to produce the scaffold and the resultant financial costs. We have developed a method for decellularization (DC) based on vacuum technology, which when combined with an enzyme/detergent protocol significantly reduces the time required to create clinically suitable scaffolds. We have applied this technology to prepare porcine tracheal scaffolds and compared the results to scaffolds produced under normal atmospheric pressures. The principal outcome measures were the reduction in time (9 days to prepare the scaffold) followed by a reduction in residual DNA levels (DC no-vac: 137.8 +/- 48.82 ng/mg vs. DC vac 36.83 +/- 18.45 ng/mg, p < 0.05.). Our approach did not impact on the collagen or glycosaminoglycan content or on the biomechanical properties of the scaffolds. We applied the vacuum technology to human tracheae, which, when implanted in vivo showed no significant adverse immunological response. The addition of a vacuum to a conventional decellularization protocol significantly reduces production time, whilst providing a suitable scaffold. This increases clinical utility and lowers production costs. To our knowledge this is the first time that vacuum assisted decellularization has been explored. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据