4.7 Article

Mixed alcohols synthesis from syngas over Cs- and Ni-modified Cu/CeO2 catalysts

期刊

FUEL
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 62-69

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.08.014

关键词

Mixed alcohols; Syngas; Cu/CeO2 catalyst; Cs promoter; Ni promoter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cu/CeO2 (cop) was prepared by a coprecipitation method using NH3 center dot H2O as a precipitant (in order to avoid the residues of alkali metals), followed by a boiling process to eliminate NH3 and decompose [Cu(NH3)(4)](2+) complex. Because the Cu particles in Cu/CeO2 (cop) were much smaller than those in Cu/CeO2 (imp) (prepared by an impregnation method), Cu/CeO2 (cop) showed a higher activity than that over Cu/CeO2 (imp) for the synthesis of mixed alcohols. Moreover, Cu/CeO2 (cop) showed a higher CO conversion than that over the industrial catalyst Cu/ZnO due to the reducibility of CeO2-based compounds. Although either Cu/ZnO or Cu/CeO2 (cop) produced methanol as a dominant product, the STY of higher alcohols (C2+OH) formed over Cu/CeO2 (cop) was much larger than that over Cu/ZnO because CeO2-based compounds could catalyze the synthesis of isobutane from syngas (isosynthesis). When Cs was introduced into the Cu/CeO2 (cop) catalyst, the mass ratio of C2+OH to MeOH in the products greatly increased from 0.13 to 0.71 but the CO conversion decreased slightly. Both the CO conversion and the selectivity for higher alcohols over CsCu/CeO2 (cop) were higher than those over CsCu/ZnO. By introducing Ni (an F-T element) into CsCu/CeO2 (cop), the CO conversion increased from 22.2% to 37.6% and the mass ratio of C2+OH to MeOH in the products increased from 0.71 to 0.85. Therefore, CsNiCu/CeO2 (cop) is an excellent catalyst for the synthesis of mixed alcohols. A slow deactivation was observed over CsNiCu/CeO2 (cop) in the reaction at 573 K for 18 h. The deactivated catalyst could be regenerated by calcination in air at 723 K and followed by reduction in H-2 at 573 K. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据