4.7 Article

Influence of pressure, temperature and steam on tar and gas in allothermal fluidized bed gasification

期刊

FUEL
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 204-209

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.022

关键词

Allothermal gasification; Tar; Pressure; Biomass; Product gas

资金

  1. EU [213628]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gasification is considered to be a promising way to use biomass with high efficiency in combined heat and power production, for the production of second generation biofuels and in the chemical industry. Especially allothermal fluidized bed steam gasification produces a medium calorific, nitrogen free gas suitable for a variety of downstream processes. In general the raw product gas has to be cleaned from condensable hydrocarbons (tar) and conditioned (e. g. adjustment of the H-2/CO-ratio) before downstream use. The operating conditions of the gasification reactor have a large impact on the quality of the product gas. Hence first steps to a product gas low in tar content can be undertaken directly in the reactor. In this study the capability of influencing the tar content and gas composition by changing temperature (750-840 degrees C), steam to biomass (S/B) ratio (0.8-1.2) and pressure (0.1-0.25 MPa) in an allothermal bubbling fluidized bed steam gasifier is investigated. It is found that rising temperature reduces the total tar content and affects especially heterocyclic and light aromatic compounds. At atmospheric pressure the naphthalene content increases slightly with increasing temperature in contrary to pressurized gasification where naphthalene decreases significantly with increasing temperature. An increase in the S/B ratio leads to a decreasing total tar content, this tar reduction according to a higher steam content is higher at higher temperatures. Increasing pressure leads to increasing total tar content mainly due to naphthalene, the effect is most distinct for low S/B ratios. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据