4.5 Article

Multifaceted therapeutic benefits of factors derived from stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth for acute liver failure in rats

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/term.2086

关键词

acute liver failure; dental pulp stem cells; stem cell-conditioned medium; inflammation; macrophage polarity; liver regeneration

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In acute liver failure (ALF), a poorly controlled innate immune response causes massive hepatic destruction, which elicits a systemic inflammatory response, progressive multiple organ failure and ultimate sudden death. Although the liver has inherent tissue-repairing activities, its regeneration during ALF fails, and orthotopic liver transplantation is the only curative approach. Here we show that a single intravenous administration of stem cells derived from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHEDs) or of SHED-derived serum-free conditioned medium (SHED-CM) into the d-galactosamine-induced rat model of ALF markedly improved the condition of the injured liver and the animals' survival rate. The engraftment of infused SHEDs was very low, and both SHEDs and SHED-CM exerted similar levels of therapeutic effect, suggesting that the SHEDs reversed ALF by paracrine mechanisms. Importantly, SHED-CM attenuated the ALF-induced pro-inflammatory response and generated an anti-inflammatory/tissue-regenerating environment, which was accompanied by the induction of anti-inflammatory M2-like hepatic macrophages. Secretome analysis by cytokine antibody array revealed that the SHED-CM contained multiple tissue-regenerating factors with known roles in anti-apoptosis/hepatocyte protection, angiogenesis, macrophage differentiation and the proliferation/differentiation of liver progenitor cells. Taken together, our findings suggest that SHEDs produce factors that provide multifaceted therapeutic benefits for AFL. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据