4.7 Article

Three-dimensional non-isothermal modeling of carbon monoxide poisoning in high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells with phosphoric acid doped polybenzimidazole membranes

期刊

FUEL
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 568-582

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.018

关键词

CO poisoning; High temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell; Model; Acid doped polybenzimidazole membrane; Performance degradation

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [350662-07]
  2. Auto21

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) degrades when carbon monoxide (CO) is present in the supplied fuel, which is referred to as CO poisoning. Even though the high temperature PEMFC (HT-PEMFC) with a typical operating temperature range from 100 degrees C to 200 degrees C features higher CO tolerance than the conventional PEMFC operating at lower than 100 degrees C, the performance degradation of HT-PEMFC is still significant with high CO concentrations (e. g. >= 0.5% CO by volume at 130 degrees C) in the supplied fuel. In this study, a CO poisoning model is developed for HT-PEMFCs with phosphoric acid doped polybenzimidazole (PBI) membranes. The present three-dimensional non-isothermal model compares well with published experimental data at various operating temperatures and CO concentrations in the supplied fuel. It is found that the CO adsorption/desorption processes follow Langmuir kinetics in HT-PEMFCs instead of the well-known Temkin kinetics in conventional PEMFCs. The results indicate that a HT-PEMFC can operate with sufficiently good performance at 130 degrees C or higher with hydrogen gas produced by methanol reforming with selective oxidation process, and at 160 degrees C or higher even without the selective oxidation process. At high current densities, it is also observed that severe performance degradation due to CO poisoning only occurs if the volume averaged hydrogen coverage is lower than 0.1 in the anode catalyst layer (CL). (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据