4.7 Article

Effect of ethanol addition in gasoline and gasoline-surrogate on soot formation in turbulent spray flames

期刊

FUEL
卷 89, 期 12, 页码 3952-3959

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.06.031

关键词

Ethanol; Gasoline; Surrogate; Soot; Laser diagnostics

资金

  1. Nord-Pas de Calais Region
  2. European Funds for Regional Economic Development
  3. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-06-BLAN-0349-01]
  4. IRENI (Institut de Recherche en Environnement Industriel)
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-06-BLAN-0349] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of ethanol on soot formation has been studied in turbulent spray flames of gasoline/ethanol and gasoline-surrogate/ethanol mixtures containing 10%, 20% and 30% of alcohol in volume. A hybrid burner specially designed to stabilize different liquid fuels flames with identical hydrodynamic conditions has been used. Spatially resolved measurements of soot volume fraction and of soot precursors concentration have been carried out by coupling Laser-Induced Incandescence (LII) at 1064 and LaserInduced Fluorescence (LIF) at 532 nm. Significant reductions of the concentrations of soot and soot precursors have been observed when adding ethanol to gasoline. A similar behaviour has been obtained with a gasoline-surrogate which has been found to reproduce well the sooting propensity of the unleaded gasoline used in this work. The analysis of the correlation existing between the peak soot volume fraction measured in flames and the Threshold Soot Index (TSI) of the different mixtures tested in this work revealed that the effect of ethanol was not only a dilution one but that the oxygen contained in the alcohol also influence the soot formation. Finally, the comparison of the LII fluence curves and time decays obtained in gasoline/ethanol mixtures showed that soot particles oxidized faster when ethanol is added to the base fuel. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据