4.1 Article

Proximal alternating direction-based contraction methods for separable linearly constrained convex optimization

期刊

FRONTIERS OF MATHEMATICS IN CHINA
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 79-114

出版社

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11464-010-0092-7

关键词

Alternating direction method; separable structure; contraction method; linearly constrained convex programming

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10971095]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2008255]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [708044]
  4. Postdoctoral Research Foundation of Jiangsu Province [0901020C]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai City [09ZR1411100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alternating direction method (ADM) has been well studied in the context of linearly constrained convex programming problems. Recently, because of its significant efficiency and easy implementation in novel applications, ADM is extended to the case where the number of separable parts is a finite number. The algorithmic framework of the extended method consists of two phases. At each iteration, it first produces a trial point by using the usual alternating direction scheme, and then the next iterate is updated by using a distance-descent direction offered by the trial point. The generated sequence approaches the solution set monotonically in the Fej,r sense, and the method is called alternating direction-based contraction (ADBC) method. In this paper, in order to simplify the subproblems in the first phase, we add a proximal term to the objective function of the minimization subproblems. The resulted algorithm is called proximal alternating direction-based contraction (PADBC) methods. In addition, we present different linearized versions of the PADBC methods which substantially broaden the applicable scope of the ADBC method. All the presented algorithms are guided by a general framework of the contraction methods for monotone variational inequalities, and thus, the convergence follows directly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据