4.6 Article

Risks of venous thromboembolism in patients with liver cirrhosis: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 206-213

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jth.12805

关键词

cohort studies; liver cirrhosis; pulmonary embolism; venous thromboembolism; venous thrombosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe results of various studies attempting to assess the risks of venous thromboembolism in liver cirrhosis have been conflicting. Furthermore, although the incidence of venous thromboembolism is thought to be low in Asians, the relationship between venous thromboembolism and liver cirrhosis has not been investigated in Asian countries. ObjectiveWe investigated the risks of venous thromboembolism in cirrhotic patients in Taiwan to evaluate whether the risk is higher than in the general population. MethodsThe data from 1000000 National Health Insurance beneficiaries were utilized. All adult beneficiaries were followed from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2010 to identify those who developed venous thromboembolism. Each identified patient with liver cirrhosis was matched with 10 non-cirrhotic patients on the basis of high-dimensional propensity score. Cox regression models were applied to compare the hazards of venous thromboembolism in the matched cohorts. ResultsA total of 757940 patients were enrolled. After matching, 2223 cirrhotic patients and 22230 non-cirrhotic patients were selected. The adjusted hazard ratio of venous thromboembolism was significantly increased by having cirrhosis (1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]1.05-2.78). A subgroup analysis revealed a much higher hazard ratio of venous thromboembolism in an advanced cirrhosis subgroup (n=293) than in a matched non-cirrhosis subgroup (n=2930) (4.36; 95%CI1.36-14.01). ConclusionThe risk of venous thromboembolism may be higher in Asian patients with cirrhosis than in the general Asian population, especially in those with advanced cirrhosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据