4.6 Article

Sex difference in the risk of recurrent venous thrombosis: a detailed analysis in four European cohorts

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 1815-1822

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jth.13116

关键词

epidemiology; recurrence; risk; sex; venous thrombosis

资金

  1. Chief Scientist Office Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPrevious analyses reported a higher risk of recurrent venous thrombosis in men than women. ObjectivesWe aimed to assess the risk of recurrence in men compared with women whilst taking female reproductive risk factors (oral contraception, postmenopausal hormone therapy and pregnancy) into account. In addition, we hypothesized that the sex difference in venous thrombosis was related to F9 Malmo, an X-linked prothrombotic factor. MethodsIn four pooled European cohorts (CARROT study, Glasgow, UK; CVTE study, Cambridge, UK; AUREC study, Vienna, Austria; and LETS follow-up study, Leiden, the Netherlands), the risk of recurrent venous thrombosis was calculated in men, women with reproductive risk factors and women without reproductive risk factors at the time of their first venous thrombosis. F9 Malmo was genotyped and carriers and non-carriers contrasted. ResultsIn total, 2185 patients with a first venous thrombosis, 1043 men and 1142 women, were included. Overall, men had a 2.8-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-3.4) higher risk of recurrent venous thrombosis than women. This risk was 5.2-fold (95% CI, 3.5-7.7) higher in men than in women with reproductive risk factors, and 2.3-fold (95% CI, 1.7-3.2) higher in men than in women without reproductive risk factors. No difference in risk of recurrence was found for carriers vs. non-carriers of F9 Malmo. ConclusionMen experienced a recurrent venous thrombosis twice as often as women without reproductive risk factors. These findings indicate that men have a higher intrinsic risk of venous thrombosis than women, which is partly masked by female reproductive risk factors. The sex difference cannot be explained by F9 Malmo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据