4.5 Article

Differentiating human stem cells into neurons and glial cells for neural repair

期刊

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 65-89

出版社

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2741/3916

关键词

Stem cells; iPS cells; Differentiation; Neural Progenitors; Cell Therapy; Neurons; Oligodendrocytes; Astrocytes; Microglia; Spinal Cord Injury; Stroke; Parkinson's Disease; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis; Review

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES015988] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS059043] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on the biology of adult stem cells, embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells, as well as cell-based strategies for treating nervous system disorders has begun to create the hope that these cells may be used for therapy in humans after injury or disease. In animal models of neurological diseases, transplantation of stem cells or their derivatives can improve function not only due to direct replacement of lost neurons or glia, but also by providing trophic support. Despite intense research efforts to translate these studies from the bench to bedside, critical problems remain at several steps in this process. Recent technological advancements in both the derivation of stem cells and their directed differentiation to lineagecommitted progenitors have brought us closer to therapeutic applications. Several preclinical studies have already explored the behavior of transplanted cells with respect to proliferation, migration, differentiation and survival, especially in complex pathological disease environments. In this review, we examine the current status, progress, pitfalls, and potential of these stem cell technologies, focusing on directed differentiation of human stem cells into various neural lineages, including dopaminergic neurons, motor neurons, oligodendroglia, microglia, and astroglia, and on advancements in cell-based regenerative strategies for neural repair and criteria for successful therapeutic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据