相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Not So Fast: Inflation in Impact Factors Contributes to Apparent Improvements in Journal Quality
Bryan D. Neff et al.
BIOSCIENCE (2010)
Negative changes in the scientific publication process in ecology: potential causes and consequences
Bernhard Statzner et al.
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY (2010)
Behind the shroud: a survey of editors in ecology and evolution
Olyana N. Grod et al.
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (2010)
Effects of metals on aquatic assemblages: What do we really know?
M. Mayer-Pinto et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY (2010)
Ecosystem Services for 2020
C. Perrings et al.
SCIENCE (2010)
Awkward wording. Rephrase: linguistic injustice in ecological journals
Miguel Clavero
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2010)
The Golden Rule of Reviewing
Mark A. McPeek et al.
AMERICAN NATURALIST (2009)
Juniors Seek an End to the Impact Factor Race
Francois Brischoux et al.
BIOSCIENCE (2009)
What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?
Sara Schroter et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE (2008)
Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors
Amber E. Budden et al.
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2008)
Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance
JS Ross et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2006)
Bias in peer review of organic farming grant applications
Jesper Rasmussen et al.
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES (2006)
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
JE Hirsch
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2005)
Gender bias in the refereeing process?
T Tregenza
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2002)
Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals
E Wager et al.
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2001)
Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience - Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?
PM Rothwell et al.
BRAIN (2000)