4.6 Article

Low river flow alters the biomass and population structure of a riparian predatory invertebrate

期刊

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
卷 55, 期 10, 页码 2062-2076

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02462.x

关键词

distribution; Dolomedes aquaticus; drought; size structure; spider

资金

  1. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) (Foundation for Research, Science and Technology) [C01X0308]
  2. Tertiary Education Commission
  3. Brian Mason Scientific and Technical Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>1. Low flows in rivers are predicted to increase in extent and severity in many areas in the future, yet the consequent impacts of river drying on terrestrial communities via (i) changes to riparian microclimatic conditions and (ii) the identity and abundance of emerging aquatic insects available to riparian predators have not been quantified. 2. We investigated the influence of low river flow on a riparian fishing spider, Dolomedes aquaticus, in five New Zealand rivers containing permanently flowing and drying reaches and, in one river, along a longitudinal drying gradient. 3. The biomass of aquatic insects, potential prey for D. aquaticus, declined with low river flows while the abundance of potential terrestrial prey remained similar at all sites. In the replicate rivers, and along the longitudinal drying gradient, spider biomass was lower, and size classes were skewed towards more small and fewer large spiders, in drying sites. A desiccation experiment in the laboratory indicated high sensitivity of the spiders, with prey presence increasing spider survival. 4. Differences in the spatial distribution, biomass and population size structure of spiders were observed along the longitudinal drying gradient and disappeared within 16 days of the water returning to all sites. 5. In total, low river flow affected the biomass of D. aquaticus, as well as their size class structure and spatial distribution. This indicates that low river flows have the potential to affect adjacent terrestrial ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据