4.3 Article

Low-grade chronic inflammation and superoxide anion production by NADPH oxidase are the main determinants of physical frailty in older adults

期刊

FREE RADICAL RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 9, 页码 1108-1114

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/10715762.2012.692784

关键词

NADPH oxidase; free radicals; gait speed; frailty; low-grade inflammation; fibrinogen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Physical performance measured by gait speed is being recognized as a major instrument for clinical evaluation in older adults, because it predicts physical frailty, loss of autonomy, hospitalization and decreased survival. Low-grade chronic inflammation and oxidative stress, mediated partly by the superoxide anion produced by NADPH oxidase, are closely linked and could be involved in age-related physical decline. Objective. To determine whether slow gait speed is associated with superoxide anion overproduction by NADPH oxidase and low-grade chronic inflammation. Design and setting. Observational study among the 280 elderly of an ambulatory geriatric care unit (191 women, 89 men, 79.9 +/- 6.1 years old). Methods. Gait speed was evaluated by walking at self-chosen usual pace. Usual gait speed <0.8 m/s was defined as slow gait speed. Superoxide anion production was evaluated using a lucigenin-based chemiluminescence method. Inflammation was evaluated by CRP, fibrinogen and leukocyte count. Results. Among the 280 participants, 179 (63.9%) walked with a gait speed <0.8 m/s (slow walkers) and 101 (36.1%) with a gait speed >= 0.8 m/s. Superoxide production and inflammation markers, such as fibrinogen, were more important in slow walkers (p = 0.004 and p = 0.006, respectively). In multivariate analysis, superoxide anion overproduction and fibrinogen were independently associated with physical frailty assessed by slow gait speed (p = 0.028 and p = 0.007, respectively). Conclusion. Physical frailty in older people is associated with superoxide anion overproduction by NADPH oxidase and low-grade chronic inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据