4.7 Article

Elongation factor 2 diphthamide is critical for translation of two IRES-dependent protein targets, XIAP and FGF2, under oxidative Stress conditions

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 131-138

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.10.015

关键词

Eukaryotic elongation factor-2; Diphthamide; Lipid peroxidation; XIAP; FGF-2; Internal ribosomal entry site; Free radicals

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte of Spain [EX2009-0918]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [BFU 2010-20882]
  3. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elongation factor-2 (eEF2) catalyzes the movement of the ribosome along the mRNA. A single histidine residue in eEF2 (H715) is modified to form diphthamide. A role for eEF2 in the cellular stress response is highlighted by the fact that eEF2 is sensitive to oxidative stress and that it must be active to drive the synthesis of proteins that help cells to mitigate the adverse effects of oxidative stress. Many of these proteins are encoded by mRNAs containing a sequence called an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES). Under high oxidative stress conditions diphthamide-deficient cells were significantly more sensitive to cell death. These results suggest that diphthamide may play a role in protection against the degradation of eEF2. This protection is especially important in those situations in which eEF2 is necessary for the reprogramming of translation from global to IRES synthesis. Indeed, we found that the expression of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), two proteins synthesized from mRNAs with IRESs that promote cell survival, is deregulated in diphthamide-deficient cells. Our findings therefore suggest that eEF2 diphthamide controls the selective translation of IRES-dependent protein targets XIAP and FGF2, critical for cell survival under conditions of oxidative stress. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据