4.7 Article

Pharmacokinetic modeling of ascorbate diffusion through normal and tumor tissue

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 340-352

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.09.023

关键词

Ascorbate; Tumor hypoxia; Pharmacokinetics; Hypoxia-inducible factor-1; 2-Oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases; Free radicals

资金

  1. Tertiary Education Commission, New Zealand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ascorbate is delivered to cells via the vasculature, but its ability to penetrate into tissues remote from blood vessels is unknown. This is particularly relevant to solid tumors, which often contain regions with dysfunctional vasculature, with impaired oxygen and nutrient delivery, resulting in upregulation of the hypoxic response and also the likely depletion of essential plasma-derived biomolecules, such as ascorbate. In this study, we have utilized a well-established multicell-layered, three-dimensional pharmacokinetic model to measure ascorbate diffusion and transport parameters through dense tissue in vitro. Ascorbate was found to penetrate the tissue at a slightly lower rate than mannitol and to travel via the paracellular route. Uptake parameters into the cells were also determined. These data were fitted to the diffusion model, and simulations of ascorbate pharmacokinetics in normal tissue and in hypoxic tumor tissue were performed with varying input concentrations, ranging from normal dietary plasma levels (10-100 mu M) to pharmacological levels (> 1 mM) as seen with intravenous infusion. The data and simulations demonstrate heterogeneous distribution of ascorbate in tumor tissue at physiological blood levels and provide insight into the range of plasma ascorbate concentrations and exposure times needed to saturate all regions of a tumor. The predictions suggest that supraphysiological plasma ascorbate concentrations (> 100 mu M) are required to achieve effective delivery of ascorbate to poorly vascularized tumor tissue. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据