4.7 Article

The cross talk between pathways in the repair of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in mouse and human cells

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 53, 期 11, 页码 2171-2177

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.08.593

关键词

DNA repair; Oxidatively damaged DNA; Xeroderma pigmentosum; Cockayne syndrome; Free radicals

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Progetto Integrato Oncologia (Ministry of Public Health)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although oxidatively damaged DNA is repaired primarily via the base excision repair (BER) pathway, it is now evident that multiple subpathways are needed. Yet, their relative contributions and coordination are still unclear. Here, mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) from selected nucleotide excision repair (NER) and/or BER mouse mutants with severe (Csb(m/m)/Xpa(-/-) and Csb(m/m)/Xpc(-/-)), mild (Csb(m/m)), or no progeria (X7a(-/-), Xpc(-/-), Ogg1(-/-), Csbm/m/Ogg1(-/-)) or wild-type phenotype were exposed to an oxidizing agent, potassium bromate, and genomic 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoGua) levels were measured by HPLC-ED. The same oxidized DNA base was measured in NER/BER-defective human cell lines obtained after transfection with replicative plasmids encoding siRNA targeting DNA repair genes. We show that both BER and NER factors contribute to the repair of 8-oxoGua, although to different extents, and that the repair profiles are similar in human compared to mouse cells. The BER DNA glycosylase OGG1 dominates 8-oxoGua repair, whereas NER (XPC, XPA) and transcription-coupled repair proteins (CSB and CSA) are similar, but minor contributors. The comparison of DNA oxidation levels in double versus single defective MEFs indicates increased oxidatively damaged DNA only when both CSB a id XPC/XPA are defective, indicating that these proteins operate in different pathways. Moreover, vie provide the first evidence of an involvement of XPA in the control of oxidatively damaged DNA in human primary cells. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据