4.7 Article

Damage to mtDNA in liver injury of patients with extrahepatic cholestasis: The protective effects of mitochondrial transcription factor A

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 52, 期 9, 页码 1543-1551

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.01.007

关键词

Cholestasis; Chenotleoxycholic acid; Mitochondrial DNA; Oxidative stress; Mitochondrial dysfunction; Mitochondrial transcription factor A; Free radicals

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30872494, 81172646]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction are involved in the pathogenesis of chronic liver cholestasis. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is highly susceptible to oxidative stress and mtDNA damage leads to mitochondrial dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate the mtDNA alterations that occurred during liver injury in patients with extrahepatic cholestasis. Along with an increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and a decrease in ATP levels, extrahepatic cholestatic patients presented a significant increase in mitochondrial 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels and decreases in mtDNA copy number, rntDNA transcript levels, and mtDNA nucleoid structure. In L02 cells, glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA) induced similar damage to the mtDNA and mitochondria. In line with the mtDNA alterations, the mRNA and protein levels of mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) were significantly decreased both in cholestatic patients and in GCDCA-treated L02 cells. Moreover, overexpression of TEAM could efficiently attenuate the mtDNA damage induced by GCDCA in L02 cells. However, without its C-tail, Delta C-TFAM appeared less effective against the hepatotoxicity of GCDCA than the wild-type TFAM. Overall, our study demonstrates that mtDNA damage is involved in liver damage in extrahepatic cholestatic patients. The mtDNA damage is attributable to the loss of TFAM. TEAM has mtDNA-protective effects against the hepatotoxicity of bile acid during cholestasis. (c) 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据