4.7 Review

Measurement of in vivo nitric oxide synthesis in humans using stable isotopic methods: a systematic review

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 795-804

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.05.032

关键词

Nitric oxide; Stable isotope tracers; Measurement protocols; Systematic review; Free radicals

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A090_1005] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A090_1005] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MC_UP_A090_1005] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stable isotopic methods are considered the gold standard for the measurement of rates of in vivo NO production. However, values reported for healthy human individuals differ by more than 1 order of magnitude. The reason for the apparent variability in NO production is unclear. The primary aim of this review was to evaluate and compare the rates of in vivo NO production in health and disease using stable isotope methods. Articles were retrieved using the PubMed electronic database. Information on concentrations, isotopic enrichments of fluxes, and conversion rates of molecules involved in the NO metabolic pathway was extracted from selected articles; 35 articles were included in the final analysis. Three protocols were identified, including the arginine-citrulline, the arginine-nitrate, and the oxygen-nitrate protocols. The arginine-citrulline protocol showed a wider variability compared to the arginine-nitrate and oxygen-nitrate protocols. The direction of the association between disease state and rate of NO production was essentially determined by the etiopathogenesis of the disorder (inflammatory, metabolic, vascular). Considerable variation in methodologies used to assess whole-body NO synthesis in humans exists. The precision of several aspects of the techniques and the validity of some assumptions made remain unknown, and there is a paucity of information about physiological rates of NO production from childhood over adolescence to old age. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据