4.7 Article

Novel insights into interactions between mitochondria and xanthine oxidase in acute cardiac volume overload

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 51, 期 11, 页码 1975-1984

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.08.022

关键词

Volume overload; Oxidative stress; MitoQ; Stretch; Mitochondria; Allopurinol; Free radicals

资金

  1. NHLBI [RO1 HL54816]
  2. Specialized Center of Clinically Orientated Research in Cardiac Dysfunction [P50HL077100]
  3. National Institutes of Health [T 32 HL007918]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) is increased in the left ventricle (LV) of humans with volume overload (VO), and mitochondrial inhibition of the respiratory chain occurs in animal models of VU. Because mitochondria are both a source and a target of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, we hypothesized that activation of XOR and mitochondrial dysfunction are interdependent. To test this we used the aortocaval fistula (ACF) rat model of VU and a simulation of the stretch response in isolated adult cardiomyocytes with and without the inhibitor of XOR, allopurinol, or the mitochondrially targeted antioxidant MitoQ. Xanthine oxidase (XO) activity was increased in cardiomyocytes from ACF vs sham rats (24 h) without an increase in XO protein. A twofold increase in LV end-diastolic pressure/wall stress and a decrease in LV systolic elastance with ACF were improved when allopurinol treatment (100 mg/kg) was started at ACF induction. Subsarcolemmal State 3 mitochondrial respiration was significantly decreased in ACF and normalized by allopurinol. Cardiomyocytes subjected to 3 h cyclical stretch resulted in an increase in XO activity and mitochondrial swelling, which was prevented by allopurinol or MitoQ pretreatment. These studies establish an early interplay between cardiomyocyte XO activation and bioenergetic dysfunction that may provide a new target that prevents progression to heart failure in VO. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据