4.7 Article

Reaction between nitric oxide, glutathione, and oxygen in the presence and absence of protein: How are S-nitrosothiols formed?

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 55-64

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.10.026

关键词

Nitric oxide; Glutathione; S-Nitrosoglutathione; S-Nitrosothiols; Mechanisms

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [GM55792, HL063119]
  2. National Biomedical EPR Center, Medical College of Wisconsin [P41-EB001980]
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL063119] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [P41EB001980] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R29GM055792, R01GM055792] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reaction between NO, thiols, and oxygen has been studied in some detail in vitro due to its perceived importance in the mechanism of NO-dependent signal transduction. The formation of S-nitrosothiols and thiol disulfides from this chemistry has been suggested to be an important component of the biological chemistry of NO, and such subsequent thiol modifications may result in changes in cellular function and phenotype. In this study we have reinvestigated this reaction using both experiment and simulation and conclude that: (i) S-nitrosation through radical and nonradical pathways is occurring simultaneously, (ii) S-nitrosation through direct addition of NO to thiol does not occur to any meaningful extent, and (iii) protein hydrophobic environments do not catalyze or enhance S-nitrosation of either themselves or of glutathione. We conclude that S-nitrosation and disulfide formation in this system occur only after the initial reaction between NO and oxygen to form nitrogen dioxide, and that hydrophobic protein environments are unlikely to play any role in enhancing and targeting S-nitrosothiol formation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据