4.7 Article

Oxidative stress in skeletal Muscle causes severe disturbance of exercise activity without muscle atrophy

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 48, 期 9, 页码 1252-1262

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.02.011

关键词

Reactive oxygen species; Superoxide anions; Manganese superoxide dismutase; Oxidative stress; Mitochondria; Free radicals

资金

  1. Program for the Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences
  2. Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, Sports, and Technology [17390085, 20390085, 20500641, 17790201]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17390085, 20390085, 17790201, 20500641] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels that occurs during intense exercise has been proposed to be one of the major causes of muscle fatigue. In addition, the accumulation of cellular damage due to ROS is widely regarded to be one of the factors triggering age-related pathological conditions in skeletal muscle. To investigate the pathological significance of oxidative stress in skeletal muscle, we generated skeletal muscle-specific manganese superoxide dismutase-deficient (muscle-Sod2(-/-)) mice. The mutant mice showed severe disturbances in exercise activity, but no atrophic changes in their skeletal muscles. In histological and histochemical analyses, the mutant mice showed centralized nuclei in their muscle fibers and selective loss of enzymatic activity in mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes. In addition, the mutant mice displayed increased oxidative damage and reduced ATP content in their muscle tissue. Furthermore, a single administration of the antioxidant EUK-8 significantly improved exercise activity and increased the cellular ATP level in skeletal muscle. These results imply that the superoxide anions generated in mitochondria play a pivotal role in the progression of exercise intolerance. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据