4.7 Article

Estrogen down-regulates uncoupling proteins and increases oxidative stress in breast cancer

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 506-512

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.11.025

关键词

Oxidative stress; Breast cancer; Estrogens; Uncoupling proteins; Free radicals

资金

  1. government of Spain [PI060266, PI060293]
  2. Comunilat Autonoma de les Illes Balears
  3. Comunidad Autonoma de las Islas Baleares
  4. Asociacion Espanola contra el Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidative stress has been postulated as one of the mechanisms underlying the estrogen carcinogenic effect in breast cancel Estrogens are known to increase mitochondrial-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) by an unknown mechanism. Given that uncoupling proteins (UCPs) are key regulators of mitochondrial energy efficiency and ROS production. our aim was to check the presence and activity of UCPs ill estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cells and tumors, as well as their relation to oxidative stress Estrogen (1 nM) induced higher oxidative stress in the ER-positive MCF-7 cell line, showing increased mitochondrial membrane potential, H2O2 levels, and DNA and protein damage compared to ER-negative MDA-MB-231 cells. All isoforms of uncoupling proteins were highly expressed in ER-positive breast cancer cells and tumors compared to negative ones ROS production in mitochondria isolated front MCF-7 was increased by inhibition of UCPs with GDP, but not in mitochondria from MDA-MB-231 Estrogen treatment decreased uncoupling protein and catalase levels in MCF-7 and decreased GDP-dependent ROS production in isolated mitochondria On the whole, these results suggest that estrogens, through all ER-dependent mechanism, play increase mitochondrial ROS production by repressing uncoupling proteins, which offers a new perspective oil the understanding of why estrogens are a risk factor for breast cancer. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据