4.7 Article

Uncoupling protein-3 lowers reactive oxygen species production in isolated mitochondria

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 606-611

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.05.010

关键词

Adenine nucleotide translocase; Membrane potential; Mitochondria; Reactive oxygen species; Uncoupling protein; ANT; UCP3

资金

  1. Medical Research Council (UK)
  2. National Institutes of Health (USA) [P01 AG025901, PL1 AG032118, P30 AG025708]
  3. Keck Foundation
  4. MRC [MC_U105663137] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_U105663137] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondria are the major cellular producers of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and mitochondrial ROS production increases steeply with increased proton-motive force. The uncoupling proteins (UCP1, UCP2, and UCP3) and adenine nucleotide translocase induce proton leak in response to exogenously added fatty acids, superoxide, or lipid peroxidation products. Mild uncoupling by these proteins may provide a negative feedback loop to decrease proton-motive force and attenuate ROS production. Using wild-type and Ucp3(-/-) mice, we found that native UCP3 actively lowers the rate of ROS production in isolated energized skeletal muscle mitochondria, in the absence of exogenous activators. The estimated specific activity of UCP3 in lowering ROS production was 90 to 500 times higher than that of the adenine nucleotide translocase. The mild uncoupling hypothesis was tested by measuring whether the effect of UCP3 on ROS production could be mimicked by chemical uncoupling. A chemical uncoupler mimicked the effect of UCP3 at early time points after mitochondrial energization, in support of the mild uncoupling hypothesis. However, at later time points the uncoupler did not mimic UCP3, suggesting that UCP3 can also affect ROS production through a membrane potential-independent mechanism. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据