4.7 Article

SREBP-1c in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease induced by Western-type high-fat diet plus fructose in rats

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 47, 期 7, 页码 1067-1074

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.07.016

关键词

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; Oxidative stress; Dehydroepiandrosterone; Sterol-regulatory element binding protein-1c; Insulin resistance; High-fat diet plus fructose

资金

  1. MIUR [PRIN 2007]
  2. Regione Piemonte 2008
  3. CRT Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study concentrated on the initial events triggering the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease induced by a high-fat plus fructose (HF-F) diet and on the possibility of delaying nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression by adding dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) to the diet. Sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) activation plays a crucial role in the progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease induced by an HF-F diet. This study investigated the protective effects of DHEA, a compound of physiological origin with multitargeted antioxidant properties, against the induction of SREBP-1c and on liver insulin resistance in rats fed an HF-F diet, which mimics a typical unhealthy Western diet. An HF-F diet, fortified or not with DHEA (0.01%, w/w), was administered for 15 weeks to male Wistar rats. After HF-F the liver showed unbalanced oxidative status, fatty infiltration, hepatic insulin resistance, and inflammation. The addition of DHEA to the diet reduced both activation of oxidative-stress-dependent pathways and expression of SREBP-1c and partially restored the expression of liver X-activated receptor-a and insulin receptor substrate-2 genes. DHEA supplementation of the HF-F diet reduced de novo lipogenesis and delayed progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, demonstrating a relationship between oxidative stress and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease via SREBP-1c. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据