4.7 Article

High levels of thioredoxin reductase 1 modulate drug-specific cytotoxic efficacy

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 47, 期 11, 页码 1661-1671

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.09.016

关键词

Thioredoxin reductase; Selenoprotein; Cancer; Cytotoxicity; Chemotherapy; Free radicals

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council (Medicine)
  2. Swedish Cancer Society
  3. Hedlunds Stiftelse, Knut and Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, and Karolinska Institutet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The selenoprotein thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1) is Currently recognized as a plausible anticancer drug target. Here we analyzed the effects of TrxR1 targeting in the human A549 lung carcinoma cell line, having a very high basal TrxR1 expression. We determined the total cellular TrxR activity to be 271.4 +/- 39.5 nmol min(-1) per milligram of total protein, which by far exceeded the total thioredoxin activity (39.2 +/- 3.5 nmol min(-1) per milligram of total protein). Knocking down TrxR1 by approx 90% using siRNA gave only a slight effect on cell growth, irrespective of concurrent glutathione depletion (>= 98% decrease), and no increase in cell death or distorted cell cycle phase distributions. This apparent lack of phenotype could probably be explained by Trx functions being maintained by the remaining TrxR1 activity. TrxR1 knockdown nonetheless yielded drug-specific modulation of cytotoxic efficacy in response to various chemotherapeutic agents. No changes in response upon exposure to auranofin or juglone were seen after TrxR1 knockdown, whereas sensitivity to 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene or menadione became markedly increased. In contrast, a virtually complete resistance to cisplatin using concentrations up to 20 mu M appeared upon TrxR1 knockdown. The results suggest that high overexpression of TrxR has an impact not necessarily linked to Trx function that nonetheless modulates drug-specific cytotoxic responses. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据