4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Lipid-derived free radical production in superantigen-induced interstitial pneumonia

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 241-249

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.04.017

关键词

Autoimmune disease; Interstitial pneumonia; Superantigen; Lipid-derived carbon-centered free radical; ESR spin trapping; Free radicals

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 ES999999, Z01 ES050117-17] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the free radical generation involved in the development of interstitial pneumonia (IP) in an animal model of autoimmune disease. We observed an electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrum of alpha-(4-pyridyl-1-oxide)-N-tert-butylnitrone (POBN) radical adducts detected in the lipid extract Of lungs in autoimmune-prone mice after intratracheal instillation of staphylococcal enterotoxin B. The POBN adducts detected by ESR were paralleled by infiltration of macrophages and neutrophils into the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. To further investigate the mechanism of free radical generation, mice were pretreated with the macrophage toxicant gadolinium chloride, which significantly Suppressed the radical generation. Free radical generation was also decreased by pretreatment with the xanthine oxidise (XO) inhibitor allopurinol, the iron chelator Desferal, and the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibitor 1400W. Histopathologically, these drugs significantly reduced both the cell infiltration into the alveolar septal walls and the synthesis of pulmonary collagen fibers. Experiments with NADPH oxidase knockout mice showed that NADPH oxidase did not contribute to lipid radical generation. These results suggest that lipid-derived carbon-centered free radical production is important in the manifestation of IP and that a macrophage toxicant, an XO inhibitor, an iron chelator, and an iNOS inhibitor protect against both radical generation and the manifestation of IP. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据